![]() ![]() Affected products ACCU-CHEK AVIVA STRIPS (50s)Īccu-Chek Inform II strips (professional use only) ![]() It is also advised anyone with concerns about their blood glucose readings should discuss this with a healthcare professional. If anyone finds they have test strips from the affected lots, they are advised to seek alternative testing methods and return affected lots to their pharmacy or shop where they will be offered a replacement. It is estimated that more than 260,000 packs have been affected. More information can be found in this field safety notice. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency ( MHRA) are urging users to check the lot numbers of their test strips against the lot numbers listed in the table below. The test strips, commonly used by diabetics for blood glucose testing, may give increased strip error messages prior to dosing with blood and in some cases may give falsely high or low readings which may be hard to detect. The suspect product was requested to be returned, however, the customer no longer has the vial of strips that were used for the aforementioned tests.People with diabetes are advised to stop using and return specific lots of Accu-Chek Aviva and Accu-Chek Performa test strips following a recent recall by the manufacturer.Īccu-Chek Inform II test strips have also been recalled but are supplied in the UK by Roche for professional use only. The patient's symptoms improved after they were given the d50.Īll of the results were obtained using strips from the same vial of strips. ![]() The patient was tested again at 7:02am on this meter and obtained a result of 271 mg/dl. Lo indicates the blood glucose is below 10 mg/dl.Īt that point the nurse gave the patient d50. The nurse then tested the patient again on inform ii meter (serial number (b)(4)) at 6:54 am and received a result of lo. The patient symptoms of stomach pain and shaking became worse. The nurse gave the patient 10 units of novolog as treatment since she had misinterpreted the previous results of rr lo to mean the patient's blood glucose was high. The nurse then tested the patient on a second inform ii meter (serial number (b)(4)) at 6:49am. She tested the patient again at 6:20 am and at 6:33 am with a result of rr lo on the same meter. It was further reported that the nurse did not treat the patient with d50 as she should of have based on the result. The nurse testing the patient interpreted the results of rr lo to be a high blood sugar, however, the alarm was notifying them that the results were actually below the institution's defined reportable range. The reportable range for the facility is 20 mg/dl to 600 mg/dl. Rr lo is an alarm set by the institution for results that are below their defined reportable range threshold but are within the system measurement range of 10 mg/dl to 600 mg/dl. They were tested on the same meter at 6:19 am and a result of rr lo was obtained. On the morning of (b)(6) 2015, the caller stated that the patient was feeling low symptoms of stomach pain. A patient was tested on (b)(6) 2015 at 6:06 pm on inform ii meter (serial number (b)(4)) and received a result of 235 mg/dl with no symptoms. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |